One can not turn a whore into a housewife.
Mar 21, 2010
Jan 25, 2010
Jan 14, 2010
Real, Unbias News.
Always check out Democracy now. It is only of the only places that does not slant any of the news. If it's good, they let it speak for itself. If it's bad, they don't need to drive it home.
What a load of it, from Gary Kreep of the USJF.
(This letter was sent to me by a very dear friend. I then tell you how I see the situation.)
Dear Concerned Friend,
Barack Obama is at it again. This time he wants to impose his socialistic views on the United States by subjecting our citizens to the International Criminal Court (ICC).
He recently dispatched a delegation to The Hague to explore issues involving United States' involvement in the ICC, an organization that USJF believes could be used to prosecute American soldiers and political leaders on trumped up criminal charges brought by left wing, or terrorist supporting, governments, like Iran.
Barack Obama believes that the United States should be subject to global laws, instead of the United States Constitution.
We here at the United States Justice foundation (USJF) are very concerned about this shift in United States policy, as the ICC does not recognize many of the U.S. Constitution's provisions protecting defendants in criminal trials, such as the right to trial by jury, and protections against double-jeopardy, which are the cornerstones of the Bill of Rights.
A main tenet of the ICC is that its jurisdiction extends only to those nations that ratify the ICC treaty. However, the Obama administration is, apparently, going to adopt a policy that would subject the United States to the ICC, even if the U. S. Senate does not adopt the treaty. THIS VIOLATES OUR CONSTITUTION!
The so-called "Rome" statute provides that when the basic requisites for ICC jurisdiction under part of the statute have been met, then the ICC may exercise criminal jurisdiction over nationals of States not party to the Rome Statute, in this case, the citizens of our country.
The ICC was given such jurisdiction in order to ensure that offenders of the most serious international crimes, which come under the jurisdiction of the Court, will be held accountable of their actions, regardless of their nationality.
This claimed jurisdiction is one of the concerns of USJF, and we feel that this is an unlawful intrusion on our Sovereignty.
We are afraid that this United States Senate, led by Harry Reid, working with the other socialists in the Democratic majority, will ratify the Rome Statute if it comes to the Senate Floor, thus destroying the sovereignty of this country.
It is believed that the Obama White House will push for ratification of this Treaty in May of 2010. However, in the meantime, it appears that this Administration will try to end-run the treaty ratification process, "just in case."
We cannot trust this Senate to protect our Constitutional Rights! We cannot trust the Obama Administration to protect our Constitutional Rights! We have already seen with the OBAMACARE debacle how the Democratic majority in Congress, and the Obama Whitehouse, do not care what is good for the United States, they just care about obtaining more power and pushing their radical agenda!
Help USJF stop Barack Obama from destroying the sovereignty
of the United States. CLICK HERE NOW!
There are two main objections to the ICC treaty:
First, the ICC does not offer the same due process rights, particularly right to trial by jury and protection against double-jeopardy, rights which are guaranteed under the United States Constitution. As I said earlier, these rights are cornerstones of our legal protections in criminal cases, our "due process" rights, and we cannot let them be infringed upon!
Secondly, the "Rome" Statute contravenes Article I, Section 8, and Article III, Section I, of the U. S. Constitution, dealing with the establishment of domestic courts.
Those on the left will argue that the Rome Statute contains due process protections that are essentially in line with protections under the U.S. Constitution, such as the right to remain silent, the guarantee against compulsory self-incrimination, the presumption of innocence, the right to confront accusers and cross-examine witnesses, and the right to a speedy and public trial.
Even though a lot of these rights parallel those in our Constitution, there is still no right to trial by Jury.
Another problem with the ICC is that since Congress neither created the ICC nor approved its rules, the Rome Statute is inconsistent with the provisions found in Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, which empowers Congress with the authority to "constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court," and Article III, Section 1, which states that "judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress from time to time ordain and establish."
The Constitution is pretty clear in this regard. The power to create courts lies with Congress, and not with the global community.
It is clear that U.S. involvement in the ICC would circumvent the U. S. Constitution and destroy American Sovereignty.
Help USJF stop Barack Obama from destroying the sovereignty
of the United States. CLICK HERE NOW!
When Barack Obama tries to evade the requirements of the U. S. Constitution and implement ICC jurisdiction over U. S. citizens, USJF must be ready to file litigation to challenge this new attack on our rights! And, when the Obama Administration, through its minions in the U. S. Senate, try to have the ICC treaty ratified, USJF must be ready to do everything that it can to force the United States Senate to not ratify it!
How? We must be ready to submit testimony to the Senate, describing, in detail, how the ICC treaty violates the Constitutional rights of all Americans. How it violates the sovereignty of the United States. How it puts at risk all of our military personnel serving overseas.
AND, we must be ready to challenge in court any violation of Senate rules by the Obama minions in the Senate as they try to force this treaty through the ratification process.
We must let the socialists, those who support the "New World Order," in the Senate know that we will be watching their every move, and that we will not let them force this upon us without the fight of their lives...
We cannot trust them to do the right thing, as we are seeing with OBAMACARE right now.
It won't stop there though. After the ICC, the plan that the Obama Administration has leaked is that they will then implement the Copenhagen Treaty through the issuance of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regulations, again trying to avoid having the U. S. Senate have to approve the Climate Change Treaty. Again, later, the Obama minions in the U. S. Senate will try to ratify the Climate Change treaty which, if approved, will devastate our economy, sending billions of dollars in tax money to foreign countries, and costing millions of American jobs.
Not only are they trying to promote the charade of "global warming", but they are also trying to destroy our sovereignty and substitute international law for our Constitution.
USJF must be ready to fight these battles, by filing legal challenges against these, and all other, attempts by the Obama Administration to implement treaties that have not been approved by the Senate, and to challenge treaties that come out of the U.S. Senate that violate the U.S. Constitution.
Mr. Obama faces a major hurdle in the U. S. Senate, where he needs 67 votes for treaty ratification. As it stands right now, that looks impossible, but don't be too sure. Liberal Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has shown, in passing the Senate version of OBAMACARE, that he will do, and say, anything to pass the Obama Socialistic agenda, by cutting any deals necessary, no matter the financial cost, no matter the damage to America. Just look at Senators Mary Landrieu and Ben Nelson, who are now "on board," after being "bribed" with special funding and special "perks" for their states, with OBAMACARE..
I need your financial help, TODAY, to ensure that Barack Obama does not evade the requirements that international treaties be approved by the U. S. Senate. And, I need your financial support, TODAY, to make sure that Harry Reid doesn't force the United States to be subject to the International Criminal Court and other unconstitutional international treaties.
WE MUST STOP THEM NOW!
Help USJF stop Barack Obama from destroying the sovereignty
of the United States. CLICK HERE NOW!
Are you willing to sit back and let this Senate and this Administration violate the Constitution?
Our country is on the fast track to disaster…but you can help to keep the situation from getting worse. I pray that I'll hear from you today.
Sincerely,
Gary Kreep, Executive Director
United States Justice Foundation
P.S. This is the worst Senate in American History and the worst Administration in American History. Our sovereignty is at stake. Our economic future is at stake! Our Constitutional Rights are at stake! We must stop the Obama Administration from taking action to implement these international treaties without Senate approval. And, we must do all that we can to stop the Senate from ratifying the Rome Statute and the Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty.
Help USJF stop Barack Obama from destroying the sovereignty
of the United States. CLICK HERE NOW!
To Donate by check, please mail to:
United States Justice Foundation
National Processing Center
PO Box 131637
Dept Code 3498
Houston, TX 77219-1637
The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) is a non-profit organization, whose tax-exempt status under IRS section 501(c)(3) has been recognized by the Internal Revenue Service. Your contributions are tax deductible. Corporate contributions may be accepted.
This scares the piss out of me, and I do not mean the acts that are trying to go through, as this guy speaks of them. The writer is an idiot! The guy considers a Fundamentalist Islamic country Left-wing! OMG! You'd have to be a member of the Third Reich to be any further to the right! and considering the genocides that have taken place in those countries, you'd be hard pressed not to compare them to the Nazis.
Also this guy is upset that our soldiers could be held accountable for their actions! Does he think a country really polices it's troops that much in a time of war!? They are people doing a job that consists of killing; and it isn't always pretty. So we do have "Rules of Engagement" ever since WWI. If the US will not hold to these binding agreements what kind of an example are we setting? "Do as we say, not as we do"! That is the kind of ideology that has much of the world angry with the United Sates.
Plus this guy is asking for $ all over the place! WTF!? Seriously!?
Not to mention he called out DEMOCRATS as socialists! Democrat means democratic by nature. By the way.... Socialist ideals are of the communists.)
And our last president did more to undermine out Constitutional Rights than anything this administration has done yet. Patriot Act any 1... Need I go into the intricacies of it?
AS far as health care goes the American people were crying out for change. It wasn't done correctly; but the call was answered. Badly, but answered. Few know that the insurance companies spent $1.4 million a day so that the government would never get to give the ability to provide health care for it's citizens at a rate the poor could afford like the original intent was.
But I do thank you for sending it my way so I could check it out.
The guy just uses a ton of legalistic speech to confuse people of what he is really saying, and to hide that he really doesn't know what he's talking about. Not to mention, if this United Government thing did get passed, it could be shot down by the Supreme Court in a heart beat.
Thank you,
Timmy
Dear Concerned Friend,
Barack Obama is at it again. This time he wants to impose his socialistic views on the United States by subjecting our citizens to the International Criminal Court (ICC).
He recently dispatched a delegation to The Hague to explore issues involving United States' involvement in the ICC, an organization that USJF believes could be used to prosecute American soldiers and political leaders on trumped up criminal charges brought by left wing, or terrorist supporting, governments, like Iran.
Barack Obama believes that the United States should be subject to global laws, instead of the United States Constitution.
We here at the United States Justice foundation (USJF) are very concerned about this shift in United States policy, as the ICC does not recognize many of the U.S. Constitution's provisions protecting defendants in criminal trials, such as the right to trial by jury, and protections against double-jeopardy, which are the cornerstones of the Bill of Rights.
A main tenet of the ICC is that its jurisdiction extends only to those nations that ratify the ICC treaty. However, the Obama administration is, apparently, going to adopt a policy that would subject the United States to the ICC, even if the U. S. Senate does not adopt the treaty. THIS VIOLATES OUR CONSTITUTION!
The so-called "Rome" statute provides that when the basic requisites for ICC jurisdiction under part of the statute have been met, then the ICC may exercise criminal jurisdiction over nationals of States not party to the Rome Statute, in this case, the citizens of our country.
The ICC was given such jurisdiction in order to ensure that offenders of the most serious international crimes, which come under the jurisdiction of the Court, will be held accountable of their actions, regardless of their nationality.
This claimed jurisdiction is one of the concerns of USJF, and we feel that this is an unlawful intrusion on our Sovereignty.
We are afraid that this United States Senate, led by Harry Reid, working with the other socialists in the Democratic majority, will ratify the Rome Statute if it comes to the Senate Floor, thus destroying the sovereignty of this country.
It is believed that the Obama White House will push for ratification of this Treaty in May of 2010. However, in the meantime, it appears that this Administration will try to end-run the treaty ratification process, "just in case."
We cannot trust this Senate to protect our Constitutional Rights! We cannot trust the Obama Administration to protect our Constitutional Rights! We have already seen with the OBAMACARE debacle how the Democratic majority in Congress, and the Obama Whitehouse, do not care what is good for the United States, they just care about obtaining more power and pushing their radical agenda!
Help USJF stop Barack Obama from destroying the sovereignty
of the United States. CLICK HERE NOW!
There are two main objections to the ICC treaty:
First, the ICC does not offer the same due process rights, particularly right to trial by jury and protection against double-jeopardy, rights which are guaranteed under the United States Constitution. As I said earlier, these rights are cornerstones of our legal protections in criminal cases, our "due process" rights, and we cannot let them be infringed upon!
Secondly, the "Rome" Statute contravenes Article I, Section 8, and Article III, Section I, of the U. S. Constitution, dealing with the establishment of domestic courts.
Those on the left will argue that the Rome Statute contains due process protections that are essentially in line with protections under the U.S. Constitution, such as the right to remain silent, the guarantee against compulsory self-incrimination, the presumption of innocence, the right to confront accusers and cross-examine witnesses, and the right to a speedy and public trial.
Even though a lot of these rights parallel those in our Constitution, there is still no right to trial by Jury.
Another problem with the ICC is that since Congress neither created the ICC nor approved its rules, the Rome Statute is inconsistent with the provisions found in Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution, which empowers Congress with the authority to "constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court," and Article III, Section 1, which states that "judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress from time to time ordain and establish."
The Constitution is pretty clear in this regard. The power to create courts lies with Congress, and not with the global community.
It is clear that U.S. involvement in the ICC would circumvent the U. S. Constitution and destroy American Sovereignty.
Help USJF stop Barack Obama from destroying the sovereignty
of the United States. CLICK HERE NOW!
When Barack Obama tries to evade the requirements of the U. S. Constitution and implement ICC jurisdiction over U. S. citizens, USJF must be ready to file litigation to challenge this new attack on our rights! And, when the Obama Administration, through its minions in the U. S. Senate, try to have the ICC treaty ratified, USJF must be ready to do everything that it can to force the United States Senate to not ratify it!
How? We must be ready to submit testimony to the Senate, describing, in detail, how the ICC treaty violates the Constitutional rights of all Americans. How it violates the sovereignty of the United States. How it puts at risk all of our military personnel serving overseas.
AND, we must be ready to challenge in court any violation of Senate rules by the Obama minions in the Senate as they try to force this treaty through the ratification process.
We must let the socialists, those who support the "New World Order," in the Senate know that we will be watching their every move, and that we will not let them force this upon us without the fight of their lives...
We cannot trust them to do the right thing, as we are seeing with OBAMACARE right now.
It won't stop there though. After the ICC, the plan that the Obama Administration has leaked is that they will then implement the Copenhagen Treaty through the issuance of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regulations, again trying to avoid having the U. S. Senate have to approve the Climate Change Treaty. Again, later, the Obama minions in the U. S. Senate will try to ratify the Climate Change treaty which, if approved, will devastate our economy, sending billions of dollars in tax money to foreign countries, and costing millions of American jobs.
Not only are they trying to promote the charade of "global warming", but they are also trying to destroy our sovereignty and substitute international law for our Constitution.
USJF must be ready to fight these battles, by filing legal challenges against these, and all other, attempts by the Obama Administration to implement treaties that have not been approved by the Senate, and to challenge treaties that come out of the U.S. Senate that violate the U.S. Constitution.
Mr. Obama faces a major hurdle in the U. S. Senate, where he needs 67 votes for treaty ratification. As it stands right now, that looks impossible, but don't be too sure. Liberal Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has shown, in passing the Senate version of OBAMACARE, that he will do, and say, anything to pass the Obama Socialistic agenda, by cutting any deals necessary, no matter the financial cost, no matter the damage to America. Just look at Senators Mary Landrieu and Ben Nelson, who are now "on board," after being "bribed" with special funding and special "perks" for their states, with OBAMACARE..
I need your financial help, TODAY, to ensure that Barack Obama does not evade the requirements that international treaties be approved by the U. S. Senate. And, I need your financial support, TODAY, to make sure that Harry Reid doesn't force the United States to be subject to the International Criminal Court and other unconstitutional international treaties.
WE MUST STOP THEM NOW!
Help USJF stop Barack Obama from destroying the sovereignty
of the United States. CLICK HERE NOW!
Are you willing to sit back and let this Senate and this Administration violate the Constitution?
Our country is on the fast track to disaster…but you can help to keep the situation from getting worse. I pray that I'll hear from you today.
Sincerely,
Gary Kreep, Executive Director
United States Justice Foundation
P.S. This is the worst Senate in American History and the worst Administration in American History. Our sovereignty is at stake. Our economic future is at stake! Our Constitutional Rights are at stake! We must stop the Obama Administration from taking action to implement these international treaties without Senate approval. And, we must do all that we can to stop the Senate from ratifying the Rome Statute and the Copenhagen Climate Change Treaty.
Help USJF stop Barack Obama from destroying the sovereignty
of the United States. CLICK HERE NOW!
To Donate by check, please mail to:
United States Justice Foundation
National Processing Center
PO Box 131637
Dept Code 3498
Houston, TX 77219-1637
The United States Justice Foundation (USJF) is a non-profit organization, whose tax-exempt status under IRS section 501(c)(3) has been recognized by the Internal Revenue Service. Your contributions are tax deductible. Corporate contributions may be accepted.
This scares the piss out of me, and I do not mean the acts that are trying to go through, as this guy speaks of them. The writer is an idiot! The guy considers a Fundamentalist Islamic country Left-wing! OMG! You'd have to be a member of the Third Reich to be any further to the right! and considering the genocides that have taken place in those countries, you'd be hard pressed not to compare them to the Nazis.
Also this guy is upset that our soldiers could be held accountable for their actions! Does he think a country really polices it's troops that much in a time of war!? They are people doing a job that consists of killing; and it isn't always pretty. So we do have "Rules of Engagement" ever since WWI. If the US will not hold to these binding agreements what kind of an example are we setting? "Do as we say, not as we do"! That is the kind of ideology that has much of the world angry with the United Sates.
Plus this guy is asking for $ all over the place! WTF!? Seriously!?
Not to mention he called out DEMOCRATS as socialists! Democrat means democratic by nature. By the way.... Socialist ideals are of the communists.)
And our last president did more to undermine out Constitutional Rights than anything this administration has done yet. Patriot Act any 1... Need I go into the intricacies of it?
AS far as health care goes the American people were crying out for change. It wasn't done correctly; but the call was answered. Badly, but answered. Few know that the insurance companies spent $1.4 million a day so that the government would never get to give the ability to provide health care for it's citizens at a rate the poor could afford like the original intent was.
But I do thank you for sending it my way so I could check it out.
The guy just uses a ton of legalistic speech to confuse people of what he is really saying, and to hide that he really doesn't know what he's talking about. Not to mention, if this United Government thing did get passed, it could be shot down by the Supreme Court in a heart beat.
Thank you,
Timmy
Jan 12, 2010
Dec 30, 2009
Harm another one, Officer!
I'm Finding it very interesting that one can find stats of how many officers have been harmed in the line of duty, but one can never find the definite numbers of people harmed by them! Looks more and more like a police-state-of-affairs to me! The USA Today let us know that fewer and fewer officers are getting harmed at work. (This is great news!) But they do not mention that the # harmed by officers has had a gross increase in the same span of time! The punishment for officers who inflict harm onto victims has also decreased greatly. We need to hold them accountable while we still have a voice. If we wait around too much longer we will not be able to right the wrong. Let us stand and use the freedoms that this country was founded on.
Dec 12, 2009
So Long to the Independence Center from a LOOOONG time shopper.
Dear Independence Center;
I was quite upset after last night’s attempt to shop at your mall. I have been going to your mall as the central arena for my shopping needs since I was a child in the 1980’s. I still remember the mezzanines, with their burgundy carpet, that were the centermost part of the mall up above the food court. I always loved walking up and down them as a child with my mother pushing my sister in a stroller. I even made games of thinking what toys I’d wish to race up and down the ramps that I got from the Children’s Palace on the 3rd floor.
Though I may not have set any records in the amount of money that I have spent in your mall, I have spent a great deal of my hard earned money in your establishment, year after long year. I practically kept Sam Goody in business, all by myself, during Junior High and High school. As I grew up, I was always buying books at Border’s, scented things at Nature’s Niche, and taking my wife to get clothing at Torrid and Hot Topic. I have also been a regular shopper at Kay’s and have bought my suits and other nice clothes at Sears for almost all of my adult life along with all of my sports jerseys and jackets.
But last night while I was in your mall I was not greeted well or treated like a long time shopper. From the time I walked out of Sears and into the main area I was made to feel unwelcome to spend my money there. I was followed by two different officers patrolling your mall. They did not even try to make it look as though they were not directly watching and following me. It was so bad that one time I walked out of a shop and the officer was still standing outside the shop from where he’d stopped to watch me enter it. It got to the point that I did not ever wish to shop anymore in a mall where I was profiled with no probable cause.
I have never been kicked out of your mall; and having been alone I was certainly not breaking the: You cuss, You Yell, Groups of 5 +, or dress code rules that you have up as a standard of conduct. (I was wearing a button up white shirt with pens in the breast pocket, blue work slacks, and black shoes with a matching leather belt.) I was not causing any kind of scene, nor was I acting in any way outside of a normal shopper trying to choose the right gifts for their loved ones for the coming holidays.
I have to say this experience has made me want to never shop at your mall again. This kind of harassment of people who come to your mall wishing to spend money has been the down fall of other malls such as “The Mall of the Great Plains” and many others in recent years. In hard economic times one should never try to keep a patron, who wishes to spend money, away from any retail store. Retail has been one of the hardest hit industries and needs no further damage done to it.
I make part of my living making the community aware of injustice and wrong doing done to individuals. You have just added another issue for me to aware the public of Kansas City to. I will miss your mall, but I think you may miss the patrons of your mall much more greatly now that I will try to keep them from being harassed by those who are paid to protect shoppers like them, and myself, in your mall.
No Thank You,
Former Guest.
I was quite upset after last night’s attempt to shop at your mall. I have been going to your mall as the central arena for my shopping needs since I was a child in the 1980’s. I still remember the mezzanines, with their burgundy carpet, that were the centermost part of the mall up above the food court. I always loved walking up and down them as a child with my mother pushing my sister in a stroller. I even made games of thinking what toys I’d wish to race up and down the ramps that I got from the Children’s Palace on the 3rd floor.
Though I may not have set any records in the amount of money that I have spent in your mall, I have spent a great deal of my hard earned money in your establishment, year after long year. I practically kept Sam Goody in business, all by myself, during Junior High and High school. As I grew up, I was always buying books at Border’s, scented things at Nature’s Niche, and taking my wife to get clothing at Torrid and Hot Topic. I have also been a regular shopper at Kay’s and have bought my suits and other nice clothes at Sears for almost all of my adult life along with all of my sports jerseys and jackets.
But last night while I was in your mall I was not greeted well or treated like a long time shopper. From the time I walked out of Sears and into the main area I was made to feel unwelcome to spend my money there. I was followed by two different officers patrolling your mall. They did not even try to make it look as though they were not directly watching and following me. It was so bad that one time I walked out of a shop and the officer was still standing outside the shop from where he’d stopped to watch me enter it. It got to the point that I did not ever wish to shop anymore in a mall where I was profiled with no probable cause.
I have never been kicked out of your mall; and having been alone I was certainly not breaking the: You cuss, You Yell, Groups of 5 +, or dress code rules that you have up as a standard of conduct. (I was wearing a button up white shirt with pens in the breast pocket, blue work slacks, and black shoes with a matching leather belt.) I was not causing any kind of scene, nor was I acting in any way outside of a normal shopper trying to choose the right gifts for their loved ones for the coming holidays.
I have to say this experience has made me want to never shop at your mall again. This kind of harassment of people who come to your mall wishing to spend money has been the down fall of other malls such as “The Mall of the Great Plains” and many others in recent years. In hard economic times one should never try to keep a patron, who wishes to spend money, away from any retail store. Retail has been one of the hardest hit industries and needs no further damage done to it.
I make part of my living making the community aware of injustice and wrong doing done to individuals. You have just added another issue for me to aware the public of Kansas City to. I will miss your mall, but I think you may miss the patrons of your mall much more greatly now that I will try to keep them from being harassed by those who are paid to protect shoppers like them, and myself, in your mall.
No Thank You,
Former Guest.
Dec 10, 2009
Why?
A story has broken out of two Kansas City Police officers who have spent over a year in jail because of a shooting that took place in a park they were patrolling. The story goes that they were patrolling the park when a gun man opened fire on them. He charged at them while continuing to fire on the officers, and the officers returned fire, killing the man. The main evidence in their favor is footage taken from the squad car. It shows that this man was coming after them, and they were firing back in self-defense.
That! Is the reason we give police the right to carry guns! They were protecting their own lives from a man who was trying to harm them. These police did not act maliciously or try to inflict harm as their first, minute provocation. Their firing on this man was in self defense.
Why did this go this far into the trial procedures? I loved that they saw jail time like any other citizen would have. But, a year later they are just getting cleared? They had footage of a man firing on them while running towards them. Unless there were other elements to the story (like not trying to get a hold of emergency medical assistance, or shooting at him when he was down and no longer a visible threat) this seems exceccive. By what I have found, these officers used lethal force when it was a serious incident where their own lives were at serious risk.
I found all of this asinine! Especially when one is to consider the numbers of times police have shot someone in the back and killed them. Or when they killed an unarmed individual because they were scared. Or when a minor is killed when nonlethal force could have/should have been used. Or the instances where a loved one calls for assistance because someone they cherish is suicidal; but the police do not try to help this person save their life, but shoot them instead. With all of these cases where justice was not served, and innocent members of our society were killed by those sworn to protect us, tax dollars and court time have been wasted on a case that should have never gone on this long. These officers have had the one commodity that can never be returned to them, taken from them. (Time)
I wrote this article from my true feelings. For all those who try to use a broad brush and paint me as a “cop hater”, I am not. All I ask for is justice and accountability of those who take the oath to serve and protect the community and citizens where they serve. They should never be rewarded for instilling fear onto those in their jurisdiction or killing them without serious cause.
If an officer kills out of anything but self defense they should see the consequences of their actions. And when we have good cops, who got into bad positions, let’s not make them wish that they did not defend themselves. Let us not keep good cops off the streets because of politics, or a lack of "brotherly love" within the police fraternity. Real “Blind Liberty” Justice needs to return. It was what our country was founded upon, and we need to return to it, one step at a time, with each and every day making us closer and closer to that goal.
That! Is the reason we give police the right to carry guns! They were protecting their own lives from a man who was trying to harm them. These police did not act maliciously or try to inflict harm as their first, minute provocation. Their firing on this man was in self defense.
Why did this go this far into the trial procedures? I loved that they saw jail time like any other citizen would have. But, a year later they are just getting cleared? They had footage of a man firing on them while running towards them. Unless there were other elements to the story (like not trying to get a hold of emergency medical assistance, or shooting at him when he was down and no longer a visible threat) this seems exceccive. By what I have found, these officers used lethal force when it was a serious incident where their own lives were at serious risk.
I found all of this asinine! Especially when one is to consider the numbers of times police have shot someone in the back and killed them. Or when they killed an unarmed individual because they were scared. Or when a minor is killed when nonlethal force could have/should have been used. Or the instances where a loved one calls for assistance because someone they cherish is suicidal; but the police do not try to help this person save their life, but shoot them instead. With all of these cases where justice was not served, and innocent members of our society were killed by those sworn to protect us, tax dollars and court time have been wasted on a case that should have never gone on this long. These officers have had the one commodity that can never be returned to them, taken from them. (Time)
I wrote this article from my true feelings. For all those who try to use a broad brush and paint me as a “cop hater”, I am not. All I ask for is justice and accountability of those who take the oath to serve and protect the community and citizens where they serve. They should never be rewarded for instilling fear onto those in their jurisdiction or killing them without serious cause.
If an officer kills out of anything but self defense they should see the consequences of their actions. And when we have good cops, who got into bad positions, let’s not make them wish that they did not defend themselves. Let us not keep good cops off the streets because of politics, or a lack of "brotherly love" within the police fraternity. Real “Blind Liberty” Justice needs to return. It was what our country was founded upon, and we need to return to it, one step at a time, with each and every day making us closer and closer to that goal.
Dec 9, 2009
The Top Has the Real Vote.
A country could be in grave danger and in turmoil. But as long as those with the power are unaffected by this turmoil. They will tell everyone that everything is just fine and there is no need for change. They don't want to see that.
The president is only the human being on top of the political system. He is only the face of a huge government. The fuel is money. Money is brought in through funding by big business. Those who provide the funds/fuel are those who run these large businesses. So, for good or bad, big business runs America and the average tax payer gets the smallest voice of all in a system built upon representation by citizenship.
The president is only the human being on top of the political system. He is only the face of a huge government. The fuel is money. Money is brought in through funding by big business. Those who provide the funds/fuel are those who run these large businesses. So, for good or bad, big business runs America and the average tax payer gets the smallest voice of all in a system built upon representation by citizenship.
Dec 8, 2009
A Dead Body for Another Dead Body is Not Right... It's Just Right.
The man who killed four police officers in a Washington coffee house is dead. When he was found, he ran, and was shot in the back until he died. The gun was empty and the police officer had had his revenge. He was just as dead as those officers, and he was killed in a very similar fashion. The blood thirsty will say it was justice. But how is killing without trial justice?
The days of criminal hearings are going out the window when these kinds of acts are allowed. He wasn’t stopped. He was gunned down. He was killed just like his victims, and the officer will be praised, not reprimanded.
This is further proof that we let those with badges get away with anything. They do some good acts of selfless heroism, and all the bad things just go away and are unnoticed. It just shows once again how a Christian society is a flawed society. No matter what one does, as long as they pray, they are all-right in the eyes of the Lord, and will see no punishment. Just the same in our society, the only difference is these guys have guns and badges instead of a book and a pulpit.
Kill a man with orders; you’re a hero. (We won’t mention Nazis here….) But if one kills because they feel like they have a need, they are the worst criminals on Earth. I do agree with the last statement, but those in the first category are viler to me than any killer in passion. These people kill because they can, and get away with it. All they need to do is put up a face that they don’t like to do it. (If they don’t, why do they keep the jobs they say they hate so much?)
Killing is wrong on all counts. The taking of a human life should be met harshly when taken by a person who is sworn to “preserve life at all costs”. This should be the most true when they have sworn their lives to serve and protect. This man showed that he did not wish to harm anyone but police. He had more than enough opportunity to harm others, but he made it a point not to harm them.
From this situation, the police across the nation took it as the opportunity to say, “Hold on! Once we feel safe (by killing this man), we will go back to doing the job you pay us for. But not before. We just like getting paid, and wanna feel safe doing it. Fuck you all unamred civillians till then!"
The days of criminal hearings are going out the window when these kinds of acts are allowed. He wasn’t stopped. He was gunned down. He was killed just like his victims, and the officer will be praised, not reprimanded.
This is further proof that we let those with badges get away with anything. They do some good acts of selfless heroism, and all the bad things just go away and are unnoticed. It just shows once again how a Christian society is a flawed society. No matter what one does, as long as they pray, they are all-right in the eyes of the Lord, and will see no punishment. Just the same in our society, the only difference is these guys have guns and badges instead of a book and a pulpit.
Kill a man with orders; you’re a hero. (We won’t mention Nazis here….) But if one kills because they feel like they have a need, they are the worst criminals on Earth. I do agree with the last statement, but those in the first category are viler to me than any killer in passion. These people kill because they can, and get away with it. All they need to do is put up a face that they don’t like to do it. (If they don’t, why do they keep the jobs they say they hate so much?)
Killing is wrong on all counts. The taking of a human life should be met harshly when taken by a person who is sworn to “preserve life at all costs”. This should be the most true when they have sworn their lives to serve and protect. This man showed that he did not wish to harm anyone but police. He had more than enough opportunity to harm others, but he made it a point not to harm them.
From this situation, the police across the nation took it as the opportunity to say, “Hold on! Once we feel safe (by killing this man), we will go back to doing the job you pay us for. But not before. We just like getting paid, and wanna feel safe doing it. Fuck you all unamred civillians till then!"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
